Maximizing your Windows machine and Protecting your images or files (part 1)

  I get lots of questions about how I deal with this or that problem while doing my image editing on Windows. Most of these problems can be averted by setting up your system a bit different from the way it came home. This will improve performance and make your data much safer. My computers run much faster than most even when they are older models. Why? Read on!

 For the Mac snobs… I use Mac, Windows, and Linux. All are good tools. None are perfect. I don’t love any and sometimes I hate them all. Anyway.. the principles here can be applied to Mac or Linux, but the details are different. I will focus on Windows for this post.

 Part 1 – Using multiple hard drives

 First… If your using the “My Documents” folder or the “My Pictures” folder you can just call those “My lost Documents” and “My wiped Pictures”. Because that is what will happen. Those are the worst places to store your data if you actually want to keep it. Here is the problem. Both of those files exist in a place on your hard drive where windows will overwrite them if windows needs to be reinstalled. And Windows can need to be reinstalled for as little as upgrading or changing some hardware, even if everything is working well. Worse, if you do have an issue with Windows and call Microsoft, the most common response you will get is “Wipe, Reformat the drive, and Reinstall Windows”. You then ask, “What about my data?” You are told, “you should have backed up”. You note that the data is fine, just a windows issue. They tell you there is no other way before hanging up. Nobody hears your screams!

 Most importantly we separate our data from the operating system. With investing and such we are told to have an “exit strategy”, “diversify”, and “limit our losses”. But with computers we do the opposite. We don’t think past the current computer box. We want to cram everything on one machine and even on one hard drive. When we have a loss we loose everything having no way to limit the losses. This “Loose Everything Strategy” is actually promoted by the standard setup of most computers on the market. But there is a better way! When it comes to your data LES is not more.

 Taking a side step I need to put this in here. If you have issues don’t “Wipe, Reformat the drive, and Reinstall Windows” with your data on the drive! You have 2 good options that will save your data if windows is messed up but the drive is fine.

  1. Boot up on a Linux live CD. Navigate to your data. Then copy it off your old hard drive.

    a) You can do this by using another computer and going to http://distrowatch.com/ and downloading the Linux ISO of the version you seem to like (At this time I suggest Ubuntu or Mint for this task).

    b)Then burn it to make a “live CD”. (Google “burning a disk ISO” if you need help burning the disk image).

    c) Then put the disk in your cd, or dvd, drive and boot from it. You will now be running Linux instead of Windows. You don’t have to worry about any windows security or Windows login. [It is worth noting that the Linux boot disk will go right past your Windows security. That fact makes this task easier, but actually it should be noted if you think your data is private because you use a windows password anyone can go right past your login by booting with linux.]

    d) Navigate to your data and retrieve it.

    e) keep the Linux cd because it is a great tool to fix Windows problems. Everyone that uses Windows should have one handy.

  2. Put in a new hard drive and install Windows on the new drive. Then reconnect your old drive and run the system with both drives. Delete the old windows files as you have time. Do not put your files on the disk running Windows. Your data is now separated from the operating system.

  So this starts with reorganizing your system by putting in a second (or more) hard drive. There are many advantages to having your data on a separate hard drive.

  1. Your data is safe from windows crashes! That is no small thing.
  2. You can upgrade computers just by taking your data disk out and moving it to the new system. No more expensive or confusing data transfers.
  3. Hackers with virus software look for your data stored in windows areas like “My Documents”, but your data will be on a different drive.
  4. Backups are really easy when you have your data separated. Just copy over the whole disk. No expensive and confusing backup software. No restore proses. Just copy and have useable files should something happen to your drive. I use allwaysync to make this process even easier. You can get this for free at: http://allwaysync.com/
  5. Your “My Documents” folder is full of program data. Many programs use this folder to store data about their program. Many issues with this… just keep your data by it self away from a “shared” folder with other programs even if it has a friendly name like “My Documents”. Also on this topic; because programs will install using this folder you can’t lock your documents down with a password if you would like to. The folder has to be available for programs. Really silly, but that is how the pros made this silly system.
  6. You can “share” your data on your local network for other computers to use, but not share your operating system hard drive at all preventing cross network viruses. One sick computer will not take everything down.
  7. Your system will run faster and better!

    A) Your data will not cause fragmentation on the system disk and you can defrag your large image data much more efficiently having no system files mixed in with it.

    B) Last but not least… the more drives in your computer the more you can spread out your “page file” and catch files. This is huge!!!

    Lets talk about the “Page File” and catch files. Windows uses something called “Virtual Memory”. That is moving some things out of system memory and putting them on your harddrive temporarily. Then moving this data back as needed. In Windows this “Virtual Memory” file is called the “Page File”. You can have more than one page file if you have more hard drives (one per drive). If you set up more than one page file Windows will use the drive that is not busy and automatically switch between them. Thus increasing speed and efficiency of your system.

 To do this on Windows XP you go:

Control Panel>System>Advanced>Performance Settings>Advanced>Virtual Memory

 Leave one page file on your Drive C: and add more based on how many drives you have.

Setting initial size to 3000 and Maximum size to 6000 works well. Web searches will show various theories in optimizing this.

 If you look into how Adobe suggests installing Photoshop on this page:

http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/401/kb401088.html

 they say this:

 Note: Adobe recommends that you set the primary scratch disk to a different hard disk than the one Windows uses for its virtual memory or paging file.

To set the scratch disk:

  1. Choose Edit > Preferences > Performance.
  2. Select the Active? box for each hard disk you want to contain a scratch disk. Note: Unless you have a drive that has considerable space open, and is defragmented regularly, choose more than one drive, if one or more is available

This means they know your system will run better with more hard drives. Not just one big one. The same principle applies to the Windows page file. Use your old computers hard drives. Pull them out before you dump the box and put them in your system. You may be surprised how many useable drives you have sitting around. I run with 10 drives in my main imaging computer, all just reused as I upgrade my systems. If I have not convinced you yet that you need to run with multiple hard drives please don’t cry to me when a Windows tech tells you to “Reinstall”

Filed in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

RAW is not raw

  There are times when a client needs an uncorrected image straight from the camera. Often they say they need a RAW file. When I provide the RAW file they invariably come back with “I can’t open this file. I tried to rename it to jpg but that didn’t work”.

  Well no…RAW is a file format, it is not just a general term for uncorrected images. Those files are not JPG’s and will not open as one. CR2 is the RAW file format for modern Canon cameras. It stands for “Camera Raw 2″ (second version of their RAW format). Nikon and others all have their own RAW format and each camera has software to handle their files. Not all software will open every  version of RAW. Current and Real “Photoshop” will open most RAW files but not all. My Photoshop CS3 will open my files from my Canon 50D but will not open the RAW files from my Canon 7D.

  So when one is saying they need ‘the raw camera files’, sometimes what they want is not “RAW” but ‘uncorrected JPG files’.

Filed in Uncategorized | Comment Now

Canon 60D vs 50D (or is newer actually better)

As I shoot jobs and talk to clients I get many questions about my equipment. As many of you that have worked with me know, I look at every piece of equipment as a tool. If something will get the job done better and faster then I will use it, but if it is just “cool” or “new” I try to pass it up. Ok… Sometimes I fall into the trap of getting the cool toy just to end up using the tool I bought from a retired photographer, and he inherited it from someone 20 years before.

Over the last couple of weeks I have been asked by a few people what I think about “upgrading” to the new Canon 60D. For those that have no interest in learning why, here is the result; I will stick with the Canon 50D and perhaps pick up my 20D again. “Upgrade” does not mean “Better”.

But for those that want to be enlightened here is a great comparison by Doug Klostermann; http://dojoklo.wordpress.com/2010/10/18/canon-50d-vs-60d/#comment-568 My comments follow here and note we reach different conclusions.

As I posted to his blog:
Thanks for your info. I am a full time Pro and use my 50D every day. I also have a couple of 7D’s. For most shooting I find the 50D easier and quicker to handle so given the choice I grab it. I will actually grab my 40D before the 7D when the result will be the same. As you know, on a Pro level all the equipment are just tools. Different tools for different Jobs. Here are 2 killer problems with the 60D for your readers to consider. For me these 2 issues are deal breakers.

1) Memory Card: The 60D uses the SD memory card like the 550D/T2i, not the CF card of the 7D and 50D.

SD cards are real slow compared to the larger CF cards. Many CF cards are still too slow for HD Vid, but SD memory would make that a painful job. I had to upgrade my CF cards when doing vid with the 7D.

2) Flash Sync: A Note to Strobists -the 60D does not have a PC sync flash socket to plug in PC sync cords. The 50D has this.

OMG… I can’t even think about not having a flash sync. There are so many times that this archaic tool is so useful that to do with out only means using the hot-shoe to perform the same function. With the 50D and every pro camera I have had for the past 25 years I have been able to use the hot-shoe and the flash sync independently or as backup for the other, as both have a high fail rate compared to the rest of the camera.

I would like to add another thing to think about. What version is the camera raw? The RAW files from the 50D can be read by Photoshop CS3, but RAW files from the 7D can not. I will have to upgrade or use the canon software to convert these. I have decided not to spend the money on upgrading Photoshop from CS3. It does what I need and so choose to stay with it. Actually sometimes I have to go back to PS7 for some things that got “upgraded out” of CS and above. So I don’t think “upgrade” always means better.

So the question here is; are the RAW files of the 60D readable by CS3 like the files from the 50D? If not that adds around $200 to my cost of upgrade.

So Staying with the 50D is my choice.

I do have a question though. Looking over my older images I noted that uncorrected the skin-tones seem nicest when I was shooting with the 20D. Additional rez. and such seem to be at a different type of image quality cost. The skin-tones of film were amazing, but we gave them up for the advantages of shooting Digital. Am I mistaken in seeing a loss in the quality of skin-tones with the 40D and later cameras?

Doug Klostermann responded:

I never used a 20D to 40D, so I’m not aware of the difference in skin tones. Perhaps one of the parameters in a DXOMark comparison will shed some light on this (you will need to cut and paste this whole string): http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/en/Camera-Sensor/Compare-sensors/%28appareil1%29/281|0/%28appareil2%29/179|0/%28appareil3%29/272|0/%28onglet%29/0/%28brand%29/Canon/%28brand2%29/Canon/%28brand3%29/Canon

OK.. first.. What a great tool! Thanks Doug for sharing this with us. So we go there and see what we get. Note the comparison between the 20D, 50D, and 60D. Almost no difference other than Mpix, and in some things the 20D actually comes out on top. “Upgrade” does not mean “Better”.

Since I have not stated it in my blog I will restate something I have to keep saying to clients that ask me “How many mega pixels is your camera? Must be a lot to get such nice pictures” I will go on record stating; “Mega pixels are almost not relevant in comparing image quality.” The fact is once you go to a pro level camera you have enough resolution for most jobs. Actually I have sold professional stock images that I shot on my phone. It is not the tool you use it is the person using the tool.

High quality prints are usually printed at 300DPI (Dots Per Inch). That means an 8×10 at 300DPI is a 20.6 Meg file or 6.866 Mpix. So we can shoot a Pro level 8×10 with a 7 Mpix camera. Note the cover of any Magizine is about the same as an 8×10 and usually printed with less DPI. We also have many tools to upsize images so we can take that 7 Mpx file and make it much bigger with almost no loss. I have an image at the Lansing Airport on their wall that is about 5 ft x 30ft (yes that is feet). It was shot on a Canon 10D with 6Mpix.

If your using the images on the web you need much less Mpix. A 1024 x 768 full screen is only 2.25megs meaning it only needs a .75 Mpix camera to shot this. So we shoot with 18Mpix (a 24 times over kill) and get good at down sizing. [sigh] Note my last post about downsizing for facebook.

To choose the “best” camera you have to look at many factors. Consider the job and the final way the image will be displayed. If you insist on the one factor that the sales person should quote to be the “best”, I would choose “Color depth” not “Mpix”. But really there is no one factor in the camera that makes the best image and the most important factor in photography is light. There is no ugly filter and there is no ‘put that light over there’ button. I think it is clear that “Upgrade” does not mean “Better” images.

Filed in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Sizing Images for facebook

     As I have taken an interest in facebook I started posting some of my images. At the same time I had clients wanting me to provide images for them to post to facebook.  As these images started getting posted I kept getting the same question, “What are you doing to make your images look so sharp on facebook and download so fast”.

     The first images I posted I took down almost immediately, I saw my professional photography look like bluty lumps on the screen. Being a bit obsessive about how my images are displayed I had to test and find the sweet spot in the facebook compression vs display size. This is what I came up with.

  1. Resize [576px by 576px]
  2. Unsharp Mask [Amount 50%, Radius 0.7, Threshold 1]
  3. Save and compress jpg file [Quality 8, Progressive Scans 5] 
  4. Upload and choose “uncompressed”

1. The image size should be within 576 pixels by 576 pixels, that can also be stated as whithin 8 inches by 8 inches at 72dpi. So, when resizing put the longest dimension at 576 pixles [or 8in at 72dpi], lock the aspect ratio so the shorter dimension will be sized proportionately. Now your image will fit on the facebook screen and doesn’t need to be resized by facebook system, which would apply its own compression.  

2. The resize will soften or blur the image a bit, so I then do an Unsharp Mask. Unsharp Mask is actually a sharping technique. This name comes from how we would do this in the darkroom with real film. To explain quickly we would make a slightly blurry contact print on another chip of film. Then put it in contact, but slightly off center [out of register], with the original negative. When printing through the mask in contact with the negative some edges would get more light and some less, thus some edges would be brighter and some darker on the print creating a sharpening effect. What would take hours, or days, to expose, develop, dry, test print, repeat until we had it right, can now be done in seconds using the Unsharp Mask in Photoshop or any image editing program that has Unsharp Mask [like Gimp which is free]. The settings vary but for facebook images sized as above the following settings look great; “Amount 50%”, ”Radius 0.7″, “Threshold 1″.

3. Now we save and compress. Save as jpg and compress to “Quality 8″ using “Format Option – Progressive Scans 5″. This give a almost unperceived difference from the uncompressed file but will be about 10x smaller file.

4. Upload to facebook and and choose “uncompressed”, don’t let the X10 that facebook says it will take bother you because we have already compressed the file on our end. Take a look, your image should look great now.

If all these steps seem time consuming… well.. your right. So I made a Photoshop action that would do the first 3 of these automatically. You can load this small action to photoshop and modify as you need. Resize for Facebook- Steve Dean.atn With this you can prep whole folders of images. Facebook lets you upload a lot at the same time so this process is not as long or hard once you set it up.

Filed in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Steve’s New Blog

Hi, I have been requested many times to have a blog to answer the various questions I get about photography and how I deal with digital issues as relates to imaging. I am linking this to facebook and geting started so here is my first post to make it all work. Real info comming soon! So hold your breath and get real excited. Then go take a nap… this will take a bit.

For those interested the header picture is off Cape Cod and the schooner is the Liberté.

Filed in Uncategorized | 2 Comments